Biden Panicked That Trump Will Invoke The Insurrection Act” — Here’s What That Actually Means

This thing is really heating up...

When I very first reported on it, people didn't even think it could be real.

Now?

Now EVERYONE is talking about it...

👇👇👇👇👇

Mike Huckabee: "I Guarantee This Supreme Court Case Is Real..."

When I first started covering the Brunson Brothers Supreme Court case, I got a lot of doubts and complaints.

Grumbling, really.

I compared it to the Israelites in the desert.

Fair comparison.

People saying the case wasn't real...

People asking why The Gateway Pundit and Epoch Times hadn't covered it if it was real....

All this despite the fact that I showed the Supreme Court website and docket confirming it was real.

Still, grumbling.

And then?

Then the Gateway Pundit covered it.

Then the Epoch Times covered it.

Now?

Now Mike Huckabee is covering it, and not only that he says "I guarantee this is real".

The leader paving the way always gets some slings and arrows in his back, and that's ok.  I'm used to it.

But I was right and you should trust my reporting.

We don't run with a story if it's not verified.

And I had this one locked down to the "T".

As in, President T may be returning soon!

Here is Mike Huckabee:

The Supreme Court has agreed to a hearing for a case that could conceivably --- PLEASE consider this the longest of long shots --- overturn the election of 2020, throw out all the legislators who voted to certify the results and leave them ineligible to run for office ever again, even for town dogcatcher.

The case has been added to the docket for, appropriately, January 6, 2023.

There’s essentially no media attention being given to this case; most news outlets find it much too hot to touch. But the heat doesn’t faze us; we keep a pair of oven mitts close by for times like this.

As Joshua Philipp reported in a podcast for EPOCH TV, the case Brunson v. Alma Adams, et. al., alleges that members of Congress who voted against the proposed 10-day audit of the 2020 elections and certifying those results --- with no investigation after being “properly warned” of a credible threat from enemies of the Constitution --- were violating their oath of office to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic.” It says that “this action unilaterally violated the rights of every citizen of the U.S.A. and perhaps the rights of every person living, and all courts of law.”

If SCOTUS ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, the remedy would conceivably involve removing the sitting President and Vice President and all those representatives and empower the Court to authorize the swearing-in of the rightful President and Vice President. Not kidding; that’s the remedy the plaintiffs are asking for.

The Brunson brothers are an interesting group –- literally a band of brothers, as they play in a trumpet band. Here they are, with their summary of the suit, which was reportedly written by just themselves, without legal counsel (!).

https://ralandbrunson.com

Note: Philipp’s report was made before SCOTUS agreed to hear the case, and he said then he would be “very surprised” if they did. So I guess he’s very surprised right now. Actually, I am, too, considering the way the Court refused to look into those very allegations in the weeks after the election, when they were brought by President Trump. (Of course, now we know much more about the lengths to which Trump’s enemies went to interfere with the outcome. Maybe enough Justices are feeling some guilt right now about calling the issue “moot.”)

Philipp also pointed out that this segment of his show, “Crossroads,” would not be allowed on YouTube. (Good news, though: he can now post the link on Twitter!) We’ll include the EPOCH TV link here…

https://www.theepochtimes.com/supreme-court-weighs-on-brunson-v-alma-case-that-could-overturn-2020-election_4907648.html

The argument in this case is that by not looking into serious allegations of election fraud, those who voted to confirm the results of the 2020 election broke their oath of office and are ineligible to run for any elected office again. To give you an idea of the scope of the potential fallout, Kamala Harris is in that group, and so is Mike Pence.

This started as two separate lawsuits brought by four brothers in Utah, but only one of them is advancing to the Supreme Court. To get it there, the brothers bypassed the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, where it was stalled, by saying in a cover letter that this suit was a matter of national security. The Court was apparently so interested in this case that they received a personal call from the Court clerk asking how soon they could get their documents together. The brothers got it all to them in one week.

The suit names President Biden, VP Harris, former VP Pence, and 385 members of Congress, and, no, that is not a typo. Those are all the members who voted against a proposition for them to investigate claims that “enemies of the Constitution rigged the 2020 election.” So, this case is NOT about whether or not election fraud occurred. It’s about whether or not these people violated their oath by failing to investigate credible allegations of election rigging by enemies of the Constitution –- allegations that had been made by over a hundred of their own colleagues.

In their words: “Is this about a rigged election? No, it’s about the members of Congress who voted AGAINST the investigation, thereby thwarting the investigation. Was this a clear violation of their oath? YES.” The suit says this violation is an act of treason and fraud. “A successfully rigged election has the same effect as an act of war: to place into power whom the victor wants, which in this case is Biden, who, if not stopped immediately, will continue to destroy the fundamental freedoms of Brunson and all U.S. Citizens and courts of law.”

“When the allegations of a rigged election came forward, the Respondents had a duty under law to investigate it or be removed from office.”

According to Philipp, a finding for the plaintiffs would “also restore Trump to office because he would have been the legitimate candidate.” We’re not yet sure how that part of the argument works but are researching. Even if a majority of the Justices found merit in this case, would they be willing to do something this huge? They would be keeping in mind the potential consequences and, of course, possible effects on the balance of power. If this happened, it would be the wildest things ever to happen within our government --- a purge, really, which, I have to admit, sounds pretty great with the state our country is currently in. But you know the saying, if something sounds too good to be true, it probably is.

And here is more of my original reporting:

TRUMPet Supreme Court Case Moving Forward!

Several weeks ago, I was one of the ONLY websites to tell you about Brunson v. Adams, the Supreme Court Case that may upend the 2020 election steal.

In fact, I was so early that many people doubted it was real.

Our articles are ALWAYS real.

If I can't vet the article, I don't run it.

And this was 100% vetted by the best source possible: the Supreme Court website!

That's kind of what it means to be a journalist....

You take in all the information and sometimes you break the story!

That's what we did here.

So much so that one comment I read to my article said: I don't think it's real, I haven't seen the Epoch Times or Gateway Pundit cover it!

Well....with all apologies to the commenter, the Epoch Times covered it shortly thereafter and The Gateway Pundit covered it today....again.

I'm still waiting for my apology from the commenter (I forget who it was, they are not memorable) but I won't stay up all night waiting.

In all seriousness, the story is VERY real and very exciting!

From my friends at The Gateway Pundit, here is Tim Canova:

While there has been much public attention on the U.S. Supreme Court’s present consideration of the “independent state legislature” theory in Moore v. Harper involving North Carolina’s redistricting, that case would not immediately upend the 2020 Presidential Election. In contrast, a little-known case that appeared recently on the Court docket could do just that. The case of Brunson v. Adams, not even reported in the mainstream media, was filed pro se by ordinary American citizens – four brothers from Utah — seeking the removal of President Biden and Vice President Harris, along with 291 U.S. Representatives and 94 U.S. Senators who voted to certify the Electors to the Electoral College on January 6, 2021 without first investigating serious allegations of election fraud in half a dozen states and foreign election interference and breach of national security in the 2020 Presidential Election. The outcome of such relief would presumably be to restore Donald Trump to the presidency.

The important national security interests implicated in this case allowed the Brunsons to bypass an appeal that was frozen at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit and get the case to the Supreme Court which has now scheduled a hearing for January 6, 2023. The Brunson Petition for a Writ of Certiorari would require the votes of only four Justices to move the case forward.

It seems astounding that the Court would wade into such waters two years to the day after the Congressional vote to install Joe Biden as President. But these are not normal times. Democrats may well push legislation in this month’s lame duck session of Congress to impose term limits and a mandatory retirement age for Justices, and thereby open the door to packing the Court. Such a course would seem to be clear violations of Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution which provides that Justices “shall hold their Offices during good Behavior.” In addition to such institutional threats to the Supreme Court, several Justices and their families have been living under constant threats to their personal security since the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

Perhaps these institutional and security threats have provided powerful incentives for the Court to put Brunson v. Adams on its dockets as a shield to deter any efforts by the lame duck Congress to infringe on the Court’s independence. Or perhaps conservatives on the Court are serious about using the Brunson case as a sword to remove public officials who they believe have violated their constitutional Oaths of office by rubber-stamping Electors on Jan. 6th without first conducting any investigation of serious allegations of election fraud and foreign election interference.

Moreover, recent weeks have brought a cascade of news suggesting the likelihood of an impending constitutional crisis that could be difficult to resolve without the Court’s intervention. It is now clear that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was colluding with social media giants Twitter and Facebook to censor news of Hunter Biden’s laptop in the weeks leading up to the 2020 election – a most egregious First Amendment violation intended to rig the election outcome and perhaps to install an unaccountable and criminal puppet government. Meanwhile, the January 6th committee may soon send a criminal referral to the Justice Department to arrest President Trump even though his reinstated tweets are a reminder that he was not calling for insurrection but for peaceful protest on January 6th. More recently, the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) was reportedly working with Big Tech to censor election critics.

 

Supreme Court Justices may well see these approaching storm clouds and conclude that the Court’s intervention is necessary to prevent larger civil unrest resulting from constitutional violations that are undermining public trust and confidence in the outcomes of both the 2020 and 2022 elections. When criminals break the law — state and federal statutes — to rig an election, we are dependent on prosecutions by law enforcement agencies that have sadly become politicized and complicit. When they break the Constitution — the supreme law of the land — to rig an election, the only recourse may be the Supreme Court or military tribunals.

 

As the Brunson lawsuit argues, all of Congress was put on notice prior to its January 6th vote by more than a hundred of its own members detailing serious allegations of election frauds and calling for creation of an electoral commission to investigate the allegations.

Moreover, the Office of Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) was required to submit a report on foreign threats to the 2020 Presidential election by December 18, 2020. That deadline was set by executive order and by Congress itself. When December 18th came and went without ODNI submitting its report, Congress should have started asking questions and investigating. In fact, DNI John Ratcliffe announced on that day that the 17 U.S. intelligence agencies he was overseeing had found evidence of foreign election interference but were split as to its significance and whether such breach of national security was sufficient to overturn the outcome of the election. And yet there was no action whatsoever by Congress, no inquiry and no investigation. Instead, Congress approved the possibly fraudulent election results on January 6th without asking any questions of the DNI and the Intelligence Community.

When the results of the 1876 presidential election were in doubt, Congress created a special Electoral Commission made up of five House members, five Senators, and five Supreme Court Justices to investigate. In contrast, in early 2021 Congress had nearly two weeks to investigate before the January 20th date of the Presidential Inauguration. Had Congress waited even just one more day to January 7th, they would have received the long-awaited ODNI report reflecting a split in the Intelligence Community and the DNI’s own conclusion that the People’s Republic of China had interfered to influence the outcome of the presidential election. As Dr. Barry A. Zulauf, the Analytic Ombudsman for the Intelligence Community, concluded at the time, the Intelligence Community shamefully delayed their findings until after the January 6th Electoral College certification by Congress because of their political disagreements with the Trump administration. This paints a picture of collusion and conspiracy involving members of Congress and U.S. intelligence agencies to coverup evidence of foreign election interference and constituting the crime of High Treason.

The Brunson lawsuit does not claim the election was stolen, merely that a large majority of Congress, by failing to investigate such serious allegations of election rigging and breaches of national security, violated their Oaths to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic – an Oath also taken by Supreme Court Justices and members of the U.S. military.

TRUMPet Brothers Supreme Court Case Update! Simplified and Next Steps EXPLAINED!

I continue to be laser focused on this Brunson Brothers Supreme Court case...

And the more I learn the more I am blown away!

And the more I am encouraged we have something very big happening here!

I have a simplified summary of the case for everyone who is still confused and I also have an INCREDIBLE video you need to watch.

Plus my take on what the next key date is...

First, a few housekeeping comments.

I know there is general fatigue out there.

People are tired.

People are weary.

We've seen disappointments and defeats along the way and I fear that just as the victory is about to present itself, too many people have fallen asleep, became complacent or became downright grumpy!

Take heart friends!

I can't guarantee this case will be successful, but it does seem to have almost everything going for it.

And I can promise you this: God will not fail.  That part I know.

There might be a delay --- and how appropriate this is ADVENT season --- the season of waiting.

Did you know that?

Speaking of the Bible, I have a general warning and caution for anyone who has fallen asleep, became complacent or outright grumpy, and that warning is this: make sure you don't become an Exodus 14:11-12 Israelite.

So...what is next?

That's the really fun part.

A ruling could come at ANY minute!

Literally today (on a Sunday), tomorrow, Friday, later this month, January....we don't know.

But there is nothing stopping the SCOTUS from ruling on this immediately.

Here's my speculation....what if it came on December 24?

Bo Polny has told us to watch 9/24, 10/24, 11/24 and 12/24.

Many people said nothing has happened, except if you look at the filings in this case, they've all happened on the 23/24 of the month:

Next up: December 24.

Christmas Eve.

And what did Kim Clement say about Winter and Christmas?

"I will make them happy, says the LORD!"

Is this the year we get our big Christmas surprise?

Keep reading for the video...

The "Trumpet Brothers" Supreme Court Case Could RULE At Any Moment! Simple Explanation!

This is gonna blow some minds...

A lot of minds I assume!

Let's start with October 24 and November 24, two key dates Bo Polny told us to watch.

Nothing happened, right?

Wrong!

It turns out, perhaps the biggest Supreme Court case EVER to be filed was filed on October 24 with reply deadline on November 24 and this thing is going to absolutely blow your mind!

We've covered it before, but I know it can be a little confusing so I have the PERFECT explanation of what is going on.

Juan O'Savin (who I really like!) was on Elijah Streams today and he laid it all out.

I mean, everything!

It was SO easy to understand and by the end I couldn't even sit down, I was just pacing in my room with excitement!

Folks, it's all coming together.

You have to understand this: the Clerk of the Supreme Court contacted the Brunson Brothers and asked them if they could speed up their filing!

That is almost unprecedented!

The Supreme Court wants this case!

And if it's successful, the end result means all 388 people elected in 2020, including Joe Biden and Kamala Harris were elected Unconstitutionally and they DO NOT HOLD public office!

They'd be gone in one moment!

Just like Bo Polny told us, in a 24 hours period, everything changes!

Wiped out!

Gone!

Trump immediately back in, as if he never left!

And here's more beauty to the case: they don't have to prove election fraud!

The case is much simpler than that.

Oh, and the case comes from four TRUMPet players, and the meaning of "four" is actually very significant, as Juan explains.

It's the final act!

The final kill shot to the Bull.

I don't want to spoil too much, but the Bull = Moloch.

Just trust me on this, this will be the BEST video you've seen in a long time, perhaps ever!

Yes, I mean that.

Watch here on Rumble and then leave a comment and let me know what you think:

Here's a lot more about the Brunson Brothers and their Supreme Court case....

Remember, we were one of the FIRST news outlets to report on this!

Check this out:

For more on that, you can watch their interview below, and near the end they talk about how they play the TRUMPet...

What a coincidence!

Watch here on Rumble:

Now let's wrap things up by getting back to my friend Bo Polny.

And if you still have no idea about what I'm talking about, keep reading and I will fill you in...

HUGE Update On “Miracle” SCOTUS Case!

About a week ago, we reported on a HUGE case to reach the Supreme Court.

We were one of the first to do so.

In fact, even now not many outlets are reporting on this.

But it's 100% real and verified by the court docket.

Let me bring everyone up to speed on what the case is first before I give you the updates.

It turns out, a huge case (a Petition for a writ of certiorari) was filed with the Supreme Court of the United States  (SCOTUS) just last month...

The case is captioned: Raland J. Brunson, Petitioner v. Alma S. Adams, et al.

And now the updates!

A response was due from the Defendants by November 23, 2022...and we got one!

Actually we got a VERY STRANGE one.

They didn't ignore it or refuse to reply.

They actually filed a reply but waived their right to respond!

Yes, you read that and understood that correctly...

The Government WAIVED its right to respond.

Here is the actual filing (which you can see for yourself is real right here on SupremeCourt.gov):

Folks, this is crazy!

The case is real.

It's moving forward.

The Government just WAIVED its rights.

And the stage is set for something truly epic!

Bo Polny Predicted The Bitcoin Crash TO THE DAY, Here's What Comes Next...

I had Bo Polny back on my show today and we talked a LOT about crypto...

If you've been following the crypto markets or even just the news in general, you know crypto had an ugly week.

Huge crash...

Big players and exchanges going bankrupt over night!

In fact, I'm working on a big story right now that is set to expose and explain exactly how we may have just uncovered the biggest money laundering operation of all time...

And it may just be the thing that brings down Joe Biden and the entire evil regime.

Yes, it's that big.

Here's a sneak-peak:

🧐 pic.twitter.com/kS5ZWrfPfs

— Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom) November 13, 2022

But here's the deal...

Bo Polny predicted the EXACT DAY of the crash with perfection!

He told his Newsletter subscribers back in October this was coming.

I couldn't post about it ahead of time out of respect for the people that subscribe to his Newsletter, but now that it happened and he was right to the very day, I had to have him back on my show to break it all down.

We had a blast, and yes we also talked about September 24, October 24 and November 24.

You might be surprised to learn some of the details!

We also talked about Switzerland, the Egyptian Sphinx on top of Europe, gold and silver and a lot more!

Oh and of course Donald Trump!

This is so good and I'm excited for you to hear it.

Watch safely here on Rumble:

Backup here on YouTube:

👉 Download Bo's slides for free: https://qrco.de/bdUurf

👉 If you want Bo's trading Newsletter, go to https://www.gold2020forecast.com/cryptocurrency-index ➡️ use code WLT49. (LIMITED TIME)

💥 For access to the Easy Crypto School, go to https://www.easycryptoschool.com ➡️ use code WLT49. (LIMITED TIME)

The discounts are only good for a short time, so grab them if you want now.

The entire history of the Newsletter is available to you when you sign up, which is something I love.

You can go back and read and see exactly how accurate Bo has been:

And then for anyone who wants to get started but is scared to do it wrong or doesn't know how, this is for you.

A trusted guide, from a trusted friend.

There's a lot of bad stuff out there, but I'm always happy to send people to Bo's Easy Crypto School:

Enjoy!