Supreme Court to Jack Smith: DENIED

This is a breaking news alert….

The Supreme Court has just DENIED Jack Smith’s request for an expedited review of the case against President Trump.

Huge loss.

This now ensures there will be no trial before the election in November 2024:

The Supreme Court has denied Special Counsel Smith's request for an expedited review of the case against Trump.

There won't be a trial in DC before the 2024 election.

No mistake – this is a big loss for the Special Counsel. pic.twitter.com/nCNiiJe5lG

— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) December 22, 2023

BREAKING: 🚨The US Supreme Court just rejected Jack Smith’s request to bypass the appellate court regarding President Trump’s challenge to his January 6 indictments under the defense of presidential immunity.

This is a major blow to Jack Smith and the Deep State who were hoping… pic.twitter.com/dlu5UdRnto

— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) December 22, 2023

Gotta love Leo Terrell celebrating:

Supreme Court tells Jack Smith Hell No!! Trump 2024 pic.twitter.com/UKtF6vXtfS

— LeoTerrell (@TheLeoTerrell) December 22, 2023

Love that hat my man!

CNN had more details:

The Supreme Court on Friday rejected a request by special counsel Jack Smith to fast-track arguments on whether Donald Trump has any immunity from federal prosecution for alleged crimes he committed while in office – a move that will likely delay his trial.

The court did not explain its reasoning and there were no noted dissents.

The court’s decision is a major blow to Smith, who made an extraordinary gamble when he asked the justices to take the rare step of skipping a federal appeals court and quickly deciding a fundamental issue in his election subversion criminal case against Trump.

Both sides will still have the option of appealing an eventual ruling by the DC Circuit Court of Appeals up to the high court, but the court’s move is a major victory for Trump, whose strategy of delay in the criminal case included mounting a protracted fight over the immunity question, which must be settled before his case goes to trial.

An expedited review of the issue is already underway at the DC Circuit, which has scheduled oral arguments for January 9. The election subversion trial is currently set to begin in March.

In urging the court to not take the case, Trump’s attorneys argued the special counsel was trying to “rush to decide the issues with reckless abandon.”

“The fact that this case arises in the vortex of political dispute warrants caution, not haste,” Trump attorneys wrote in court papers.

Trump’s team had asked the appeals court earlier this month to examine the immunity ruling issued by District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing his criminal case.

ADVERTISEMENT

Chutkan had rejected arguments from Trump’s attorneys that the criminal indictment should be thrown out because he was working to “ensure election integrity” as part of his official capacity as president when he allegedly undermined the 2020 election results, and therefore is protected under presidential immunity. The judge has paused all procedural deadlines in the case while the appeal plays out.

But Smith’s team sought to bypass the appeals court’s review of the matter by having the justices step in now.