JUST IN: Court Sides With FDA, Transparency Placed On The Backburner

A federal judge has just given the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) more cover, for now.

The recent ruling from Judge Reggie Walton allows the FDA to withhold COVID-19 ‘vaccine‘ safety data for at least six more months.

If these vaccines were so ‘safe and effective’ why are they going to these lengths to hide the safety data from the public?

That’s all that needs to be asked here. Never forget that they went to court in an effort to prevent transparency on such a key issue. Never forget that they initially wanted to keep this data hidden for 75 years.

What remains to be seen is if these six months become extended in yet another court case or legal filing. Here’s more on the story:

1- “The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is being allowed to withhold COVID-19 vaccine safety data for at least six months, under a recent order from a federal judge.”

Why should they want to withhold it?

We were told endlessly these were the best drugs ever. 🤷🏼‍♂️ pic.twitter.com/A08lqphEa1

— IT Guy (@ITGuy1959) December 16, 2023

Despite this, organizations like Judicial Watch have continued to gather and leak the safety data for the experimental COVID-19 shots.

Judicial Watch released 58 pages of records from the FDA showing that a Pfizer study surveyed 23 people in 2021 to gauge reactions to its COVID vaccine booster before asking the FDA to approve it. READ: https://t.co/pDMBVnvbup

— Judicial Watch ⚖️ (@JudicialWatch) December 11, 2023

The Epoch Times provided this statement from Judge Walton, establishing a six-month extension for the release of the safety data:

“Unfortunately I would have to conclude that because of the extraordinary orders that have been issued by the courts down in Texas … requiring just an exorbitant amount of document production within a relatively short period of time, considering the number of documents involved and all of the other litigation I know that agencies have, I would have to conclude that extraordinary circumstances have been established.”

Warhammer writes: “Final Batch of Pfizer Documents Released Shows FDA Knew Safety Monitoring System Was ‘Not Sufficient’ The FDA knew when it licensed Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine that its safety monitoring system was not sufficient to detect heart problems associated with the shot.”

Final Batch of Pfizer Documents Released Shows FDA Knew Safety Monitoring System Was 'Not Sufficient' The FDA knew when it licensed Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine that its safety monitoring system was not sufficient to detect heart problems associated with the shot. pic.twitter.com/huZCpcFnCu

— Warhammer 🕛 (@WarhammertimeII) December 13, 2023

THE FDA IS OPERATING ILLEGALLY

If the C19 "vaccine" injections are not pharmaceutical products, and therefore NOT subject to the standard FDA regulations and requirements for safety and efficacy clinical trial data.https://t.co/1GSjbM1fom

— Chelton Sledgefield (@HyperAware84) December 13, 2023

Earlier this year, Forbes published this piece revealing:

The Vaccines and Related Biological Advisory Committee (VRBAC), a group of outside experts that informs the FDA’s decisions on vaccines, voted 16 to 2 against recommending the booster shots for everyone over the age of 16, arguing there is not enough evidence to show it is safe and necessary.