Before Congress breaks tonight for a 3-week vacation, they got something done, at least!
Just this morning, the House voted to approve a $900 BILLION NDAA Defense Bill, which included funding for an extension of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) which allows the FBI to use surveillance without a warrant.
You know, the same one that allowed for the FBI to spy on President Trump!
Take a look:
BREAKING: The NDAA passes the House with bipartisan support. FISA section 702 gets a clean 4-month renewal and the FBI can continue surveilling Americans without a warrant.
Corruption wins. The Constitution loses. Again pic.twitter.com/x7HBrluULc
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) December 14, 2023
The NDAA bill passed with bipartisan support. It is now headed to Biden’s desk to get signed into law.
In case you were curious, here are the names of the Republicans who voted YES:
Here is a list of 147 @HouseGOP members who just voted YES on the NDAA without removing funding for the unconstitutional FISA courts.
Notice @SpeakerMcCarthy is one of them.
Son of a bitch is trying to let Democrats take back control of the House and have a fully funded FISA… pic.twitter.com/TCGOEhfs9P
— Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) December 14, 2023
147 Republicans just voted to reauthorize the FISA 702 program that was used to illegally spy on President Trump
Their voters deserve answers pic.twitter.com/RLtfycoCM5
— DC_Draino (@DC_Draino) December 14, 2023
Here are more details on what Congress just approved, from The Hill:
Congress has approved a short-term extension of the nation’s warrantless surveillance powers, punting to the new year a decision over how to reform the law.
Included in the defense policy bill headed to the president’s desk after approval by the House on Thursday is a measure that extends Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) until mid-April.
FISA allows the government to spy on foreigners located abroad, but Americans who communicate with those being surveilled have their information swept up in the searches, prompting agreement that reauthorization of the powers must come with reforms that limit documented abuse of the tool by the intelligence community.
While the National Defense Authorization Act’s inclusion of FISA avoids an end-of-the-year expiration of the powers, it also extends an ongoing battle over whether the government should get a warrant before reviewing information it’s already collected pertaining to Americans.
But, not all House Republicans were happy about passing the bill.
Republican Rep. Chip Roy of Texas spoke out about the truth behind FISA:
What the swamp WON'T tell you about FISA in the defense bill …. pic.twitter.com/lsODfJVB1q
— Rep. Chip Roy Press Office (@RepChipRoy) December 14, 2023
Rep. Rosendale was another voice who spoke out:
FISA Section 702 has allowed the FBI to spy on U.S. citizens more than 278,000 times without a warrant!
FISA should not be combined with our national defense, and it is UNACCEPTABLE that the D.C. Cartel is bypassing regular order to jam Members by forcing them to vote on two… pic.twitter.com/FtUTP4z9L1— Matt Rosendale (@RepRosendale) December 14, 2023
The Washington Examiner had this to say about opposition to extending FISA:
The vote Thursday was 310-118, with 73 Republicans voting against the NDAA.
A main point of opposition to the NDAA was Johnson’s decision to include a short-term extinction of section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act until April 19, 2024.
“It’s upsetting to me,” Rep. Cory Mills (R-FL), who voted against the NDAA, said. “… You can see the kind of trickery of DC where they try and attach FISA to the NDAA. That way, they can put you into that situation where if you vote against it, ‘Oh, you hate our military.’ Or if you vote for it, ‘Oh, you hate individual privacy.’ So these (are) poison pills.”
But, Johnson and the House leave for the year having passed this year’s NDAA despite angering many members of his conference. However, when they return, Johnson will have to put together and manage a highly fractured conference of people upset with his handling of issues and must pass legislation over the past month.
Join the conversation!
Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!