Major News Outlet Makes Seismic Claim Regarding Nordstream 2 Sabotage, But Is It True?

Everyone knows that the Washington Post, much like The New York Times, is a mouthpiece for the state.

These outlets aren’t independent at all—they merely represent another limb of the hydra. The Fourth Estate has been utterly compromised by government provocateurs.

The sabotage of the Nordstream 2 pipeline was not a mystery, though the CIA and the deep state want to pretend like it was. We were told that Russia blew up their own pipeline, and now we are being told Ukraine blew up the pipeline.

According to a recent article from the Washington Post, it was a Ukrainian commander named Roman Chervinsky who orchestrated and coordinated the destruction of the pipeline.

Whether or not this is true remains to be seen but something tells me that this isn’t really the truth. If Ukraine could truly orchestrate covert missions such as the blowing up of the pipeline, why are they losing the war?

I cannot say for certain that the recent Washington Post story is a fake; however, it defies logic to think that Ukraine could have carried out this critical mission. It isn’t impossible, just highly doubtful.

Many on social media expressed doubt that Ukraine was behind the destruction of Nordstream 2:

Will NATO retaliate after The Washington Post reports that the Ukrainian military is behind the #NordStream sabotage?#FactsMatter pic.twitter.com/mlTEyizq1B

— Valiant Panda (@_ValiantPanda_) November 13, 2023

Wall Street Silver writes: “New CIA narrative just dropped. Do you believe them? The CIA just planted a story in their newspaper, the Washington Post, trying to convince everyone that a group of Ukrainians rented a sailboat and destroyed the Nordstream Pipeline.”

New CIA narrative just dropped.
Do you believe them?

The CIA just planted a story in their newspaper, the Washington Post, trying to convince everyone that a group of Ukrainians rented a sailboat and destroyed the Nordstream Pipeline. pic.twitter.com/xtvF8Vqnux

— Wall Street Mav (@WallStreetMav) November 12, 2023

Zero Hedge provided more details:

WaPo reports that Chervinsky did not act alone and he did not plan the operation, again “according to the people familiar with his role,” but instead took orders from more senior Ukrainian officials, who ultimately reported to Gen. Valery Zaluzhny, Ukraine’s highest-ranking military officer, “according to people familiar with how the operation was carried out.”

More problematically, Chervinsky’s involvement in the Nord Stream assault is in direct opposition to Zelensky’s public denials regarding Ukraine’s involvement.

Writer Jon Herold shared excerpts of the Washington Post article and remarked: “Finally have a name for the person who was allegedly behind the bombing of the Nordstream pipeline. Didn’t take long to find that the guy was director of an agency “established with active participation of the CIA.”

Here we go.

Finally have a name for the person who was allegedly behind the bombing of the Nordstream pipeline.

Didn’t take long to find that the guy was director of an agency “established with active participation of the CIA” pic.twitter.com/X3OP1FmPxa

— Jon Herold (@patel_patriot) November 11, 2023

One pundit explained: “The idea that a Ukrainian secret service agent would blow up the Nordstream pipeline when they could be blowing up pipelines from Russia in Ukraine shows how absurd the story is.”

‘The idea that a Ukrainian secret service agent would blow up the Nordstream pipeline when they could be blowing up pipelines from Russia in Ukraine shows how absurd the story is’

-Going Underground’s @afshinrattansi on the Washington Post story blaming a Ukrainian military… pic.twitter.com/L1HIja2Yt6

— Going Underground (@GUnderground_TV) November 13, 2023

According to Reuters:

Roman Chervinsky, a former intelligence official who served in the Ukrainian military’s special forces, managed a six-person team but did not plan the attack, the Post reported. He denied involvement.

A spokesperson for Ukraine’s military told Reuters he had “no information” about the claim.

The Ukrainian foreign ministry and Kyiv’s domestic security service, the SBU, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.