Sidney Powell Flipped? Lawyer Says Not So Fast…

Earlier today we reported on the bombshell report that Sidney Powell had suddenly taken a plea deal in the Fulton County case.

Of course, implicit in a “plea deal” is often you get significantly lesser charges (than what the [corrupt] Prosecution is seeking) in exchange for agreeing to testify against someone higher up.

I think you get the idea…

That report was here:

BREAKING: Sidney Powell Takes Plea Deal In Fulton Co., GA

But a lawyer on Twitter says not so fast….

“Techno_Fog” is a large account on Twitter with 426K followers and per the bio claims to be a Lawyer:

So the combination of knowing the law and having such a wide following gives him some credibility.

He’s also been right many times before as we’ve followed him over the years.

And he says there’s much more than initially meets the eye here.

First, he ppoints out all 7 felony charges have been dropped — because they overcharged and they knew it:

Fulton County prosecutors drop all 7 felony charges against Sidney Powell – in exchange for a misdemeanor plea.

They overcharged and they knew it. pic.twitter.com/fL9JkUTqkk

— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) October 19, 2023

Now you could certainly just chalk that up to being part of the plea deal.

But then he follows it up with this:

Read the pleadings.

The Fulton County DA lied to the court repeatedly about the law.

They hid exculpatory evidence from the grand jury (violating the prosecutor's oath to do justice).

And now the felonies vanish on the eve of trial. Totally unjust prosecution.

— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) October 19, 2023

Read the pleadings.

The Fulton County DA lied to the court repeatedly about the law.

ADVERTISEMENT

They hid exculpatory evidence from the grand jury (violating the prosecutor’s oath to do justice).

And now the felonies vanish on the eve of trial. Totally unjust prosecution.

Ok, now I’m starting to get interested….

Kyle Becker explains more, over at ThePoliticsBrief:

Powell’s guilty plea is a boost to Trump’s political opposition, which will seize on the admission of guilt to accuse the former president of being part of a “criminal conspiracy” to undermine the 2020 election, as has been laid out in Fulton County’s District Attorney Fani Willis’ racketeering case.

Powell’s alleged culpability in the January 2021 intrusion of electoral systems Coffee County, Georgia is an integral component of her guilty plea.

Legal analysts have nonetheless found issues with the Coffee County case.

“Serious issues emerging w/ the charges brought by Fulton County DA Fani Willis – The indictment’s RICO allegations are insufficient to provide notice to the defendants per GA law,” the lawyer Techno Fog wrote. “The alleged contracts to conduct illegal activity b/w Powell, et al – are nonexistent.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“Computer trespass (Count 35) requires the knowing use of the computer ‘without authority’,” the lawyer added. “Big problem for prosecutors: the local election board granted access and supervised/directed the technical activities.”

TechnoFog reacted to the guilty plea with criticism of the court.

“Read the pleadings,” the lawyer wrote. “The Fulton County DA lied to the court repeatedly about the law. They hid exculpatory evidence from the grand jury (violating the prosecutor’s oath to do justice). And now the felonies vanish on the eve of trial. Totally unjust prosecution.”

The Coffee County aspect of the Trump RICO case alleges that Trump associates gained illicit access to the county’s election systems and proceeded to duplicate election data. Their goal was to substantiate allegations of voting manipulation to justify election challenges. There is evidence that county officials permitted access, but the prosecution has repeatedly been pressed to reveal such exculpatory evidence.

Powell’s lawyer strongly refuted the prosecutors’ allegations that she was the ‘mastermind’ behind the Coffee County breach. During the pretrial proceedings, it was asserted by the defense that the prosecution’ claims are inaccurate and that the forthcoming evidence would demonstrate that she did not play a central role in the event.

Sidney Powell became the face of Trump’s election challenges, and teased voting integrity observers with promises of a “Kraken” of evidence that would prove the 2020 election was “stolen.” Her allegations, many of them unfounded, provided fodder for those who witnessed what they viewed was a flawed election.

The plea deal reportedly requires her to “testify truthfully”.

How do you introduce evidence?

We now have two witnesses (Sidney Powell and L. Lin Wood) who will be “testifying truthfully”.

Is this a massive trojan horse destined to backfire on Fani Willis?

Time will tell.

And we’ll be watching.

Has Sidney Powell “flipped” or is there a master plan at play for the White Hats?