During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, anyone who promoted Ivermectin was considered a conspiracy theorist and was condemned by the FDA but now a Federal court has ruled the FDA overstepped its authority when it told Americans to not use Ivermectin to fight against COVID-19.
U.S. Circuit Judge Don Willett ruled “FDA can inform, but it has identified no authority allowing it to recommend consumers ‘stop’ taking medicine.”
In one social media post, the FDA posted “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.”
In another post, the FDA linked to an article titled “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19.”
The FDA has already approved Ivermectin as an antiparasitic drug for both humans and animals.
BREAKING: Federal Court Rules The @FDA Abused Authority With Anti #Ivermectin Messaging To Americans On #COVID19. "FDA Can Inform, But It Has Identified No Authority Allowing It To Recommend Consumers 'STOP' Taking Medicine," Says U.S. Circuit Judge https://t.co/76zz6k8tgM
— John Basham (@JohnBasham) September 2, 2023
“FDA IS NOT A PHYSICIAN. IT HAS THE AUTHORITY TO INFORM, ANNOUNCE, AND APPRAISE – BUT NOT TO ENDORSE, DENOUNCE, OR ADVISE” [ABOUT IVERMECTIN], wrote Judge Don Willett of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal in New Orleans (September 1, 2023).
The FDA abused its authority by… pic.twitter.com/cRPjY7C0no
— Charles B Simone, M.MS., M.D. (@DrSimone) September 2, 2023
Here’s what Epoch Times reported:
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) likely overstepped its authority when it told Americans to “stop” using ivermectin against COVID-19, a federal court ruled on Sept. 1.
“FDA can inform, but it has identified no authority allowing it to recommend consumers ‘stop’ taking medicine,” U.S. Circuit Judge Don Willett wrote in the ruling.
The FDA has authority under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to convey information to consumers.
The FDA during the COVID-19 pandemic has issued multiple statements discouraging people from taking ivermectin against COVID-19.
Accompanied by a picture of a horse and a link to an FDA webpage on ivermectin, the agency wrote in one social media post: “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.”
The page it linked to is titled, “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19.”
Three doctors sued the FDA over its statements on ivermectin, arguing the agency cannot advise doctors on which drugs to prescribe.
Ivermectin is approved by the agency as an antiparasitic drug for both humans and animals.
“The Doctors have plausibly alleged that FDA’s Posts fell on the wrong side of the line between telling about and telling to.”
-5th Circuit Court Judge Willett about this tweet about ivermectin pic.twitter.com/AV4yisFj7p
— emily miller (@emilymiller) September 2, 2023
Here’s what Just The News reported:
federal court ruled on Friday that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) likely abused its authority when it used anti-ivermectin messaging to get Americans to not use it to treat COVID-19.
“FDA can inform, but it has identified no authority allowing it to recommend consumers ‘stop’ taking medicine,” U.S. Circuit Judge Don Willett wrote in the ruling, according to The Epoch Times.
The ruling was sent back to the lower court where it will be reconsidered.
“FDA is not a physician. It has authority to inform, announce, and apprise—but not to endorse, denounce, or advise,” the ruling reads.
Three doctors sued the agency over its statements on ivermectin, arguing the agency can’t intervene on what doctors prescribe their patients.
Want To Get LEGAL and SAFE Ivermectin? Here’s How…
We just reported yesterday that a new leaked report says airlines are looking to BRING BACK MASKS in October.
Yes, really.
I fully expect a new “planned-demic” will show up right in time for the 2024 election.
Oh they might not call it “COVID” again and probably they won’t.
But I fully expect a new one to hit.
And I’m going to be prepared this time.
Whether it comes in the form of a bioweapon or something much more mundane like a tick bite or a Bill Gates’ mosquito – you and your family need to be prepared. That’s where The Wellness Company comes in.
You know the Wellness Company and their great doctors – like Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Jim Thorp – are regularly in the media speaking out against the broken medical establishment.
Dr. Thorp, one of the nation’s leading critics of the corrupting influence of big pharma, believes that now – more than ever – people should be prepared for the next pandemic.
“I’ve strongly recommended “stock piling” critical medications including antibiotics since the turn of the century. This has been an incredible investment as many friends, family and patients have benefited. Now, in summer of 2023, this recommendation is even more crucial.” – Dr. Jim Thorp
The Wellness Company and their doctors are medical professionals that you can trust and their new medical emergency kits are the gold standard when it comes to keeping you safe and healthy.
Be ready for anything, this medical emergency kit contains an assortment of live-saving medications – including ivermectin and Z-pak. The medical emergency kit provides a guidebook to aid in the safe use of all of these life-saving medications.
From anthrax to tick bites to COVID and even to a bioweapon like the plague – the Wellness Company’s Medical Emergency kit is exactly what you need to have on hand to be prepared.
Rest assured knowing that you have emergency antibiotics, antivirals and anti-parasitics on hand to help keep you and your family safe from whatever the globalists throw at us next!
The Wellness Company Medical Emergency Kit includes:
- Amoxicillin-Clavulanate (generic Augmentin) 875/125 mg – 28 tablets
- Azithromycin (generic Z-Pak) 250 mg – 12 tablets
- Doxycycline Hyclate 100 mg – 60 capsules
- Metronidazole (generic Flagyl) 500 mg – 30 tablets
- Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (generic Bactrim) 800/160 mg – 28 tablets
- Ivermectin 18mg – 7 compounded capsules
- Fluconazole (generic Diflucan) 150 mg – 2 tablets
- Ondansetron (generic Zofran) 4mg – 6 tablets
- 1 virtual consult from a doctor you can trust
- 1 Emergency Medication Guidebook written by our Chief Medical Board for safe use.
The Wellness Company Medical Emergency Kit treats:
- Anthrax
- Bacterial Vaginosis
- Bite Wounds
- Bronchitis
- Chlamydia
- Clostridioides difficile
- Colitis
- COVID – 19
- Gonorrhea
- Giardiasis
- Lice
- Nausea & Vomiting
- Pharyngitis
- Pinworms
- Plague (bioterror)
- Pneumonia
- Rickettsial Infections
- Scabies
- Shigella Infection
- Sinusitis
- Skin Infection
- Strep Throat
- Syphilis
- Tetanus
- Tick Exposure
- Tonsillitis
- Traveler’s Diarrhea
- Trichomoniasis
- Tularemia (bioterror)
- Urinary Tract Infection
- Vaginal Candidiasis
- Viral Upper Respiratory Infection
Don’t be caught unprepared. Don’t be reliant on the broken and corrupt medical industrial complex. Don’t regret not acting today.
Order The Wellness Company’s Medical Emergency Kits today!
(Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message below and ordering through the links below, which benefits WLT Report. We appreciate your support!)
RELATED:
We Were RIGHT About Ivermectin From Day One!
PAGING DOCTOR FLIP-FLOP!
DOCTOR FLIP-FLOP, PLEASE REPORT TO THE OPERATING ROOM!
In a 180 degree flip-flop a politician would be jealous of, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) now admits doctors can prescribe Ivermectin to treat COVID-19.
Yes, really.
During the COVID-19 plandemic, the FDA did everything possible to prevent doctors from prescribing the antiviral to treat COVID-19.
The corrupt agency compared people seeking ivermectin to horses.
The federal government, mainstream media, Big Tech, and pharmacies created numerous barriers to prevent COVID-19 patients from obtaining ivermectin for treatment.
After millions of Americans lined up to take the experimental COVID-19 shots, the FDA changed course to say doctors can prescribe ivermectin for COVID-19.
Straight from the horse’s mouth. Now time for @US_FDA to issue a statement so my patients can get their prescriptions filled at @cvspharmacy and @Walgreens.https://t.co/r5khovfAfe
— Mary Talley Bowden MD (@MdBreathe) August 11, 2023
According to The Epoch Times, the “‘FDA explicitly recognizes that doctors do have the authority to prescribe ivermectin to treat COVID,’ Ashley Cheung Honold, a Department of Justice lawyer representing the FDA, said during oral arguments on Aug. 8 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit.”
"FDA explicitly recognizes that doctors do have the authority to prescribe ivermectin to treat COVID."
Doctors are free to prescribe #Ivermectin to treat #COVID19, a lawyer representing the #FDA said this week. https://t.co/2IaViQTfjX
— The Epoch Times (@EpochTimes) August 10, 2023
From The Epoch Times:
The government is defending the FDA’s repeated exhortations to people to not take ivermectin for COVID-19, including a post that said “Stop it.”
The case was brought by three doctors who allege the FDA unlawfully interfered with their practice of medicine with the statements. A federal judge dismissed the case in 2022, prompting an appeal.
“The fundamental issue in this case is straightforward. After the FDA approves the human drug for sale, does it then have the authority to interfere with how that drug is used within the doctor-patient relationship? The answer is no,” Jared Kelson, representing the doctors, told the appeals court.
The FDA explicitly stated that ivermectin “isn’t authorized or approved to treat COVID-19.”
However, the agency attempted to excuse its corruption.
“FDA made these statements in response to multiple reports of consumers being hospitalized, after self medicating with ivermectin intended for horses, which is available for purchase over the counter without the need for prescription,” Honold said.
In an interview with Maria Bartiromo, Senator Ron Johnson described the destruction caused by the actions of the FDA.
“The doctors I’ve been dealing with and talking to for yours now, they believe that probably hundreds of thousands of Americans lost their lives because they were denied early treatment,” Johnson said.
“And they were denied it because the FDA sabotaged, for example, ivermectin. And they said, come on, you all, you’re not a cow, you’re not a horse. You know, this is supposedly horse medicine. No, this was a Nobel Prize-winning medicine that could have saved hundreds of thousands of lives.”
WATCH:
The FDA has now endorsed treating COVID with Ivermectin! The FDA has blood on its hands. How many Americans senselessly died because Big Medicine called this cheap, readily available Nobel Prize winning medicine horse paste?
Thank you Ron Johnson your leadership and bravery. pic.twitter.com/m0d6EonC5Q
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) August 11, 2023
Read more from the court exchange from The Epoch Times:
Ms. Honold said that the FDA didn’t purport to require anyone to do anything or to prohibit anyone from doing anything.
“What about when it said, ‘No, stop it’?” Circuit Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod, on the panel that is hearing the appeal, asked. “Why isn’t that a command? If you were in English class, they would say that was a command.”
Ms. Honold described the statements as “merely quips.”
“Can you answer the question, please? Is that a command, ‘Stop it’?” Judge Elrod asked.
“In some contexts, those words could be construed as a command,” Ms. Honold said. “But in this context, where FDA was simply using these words in the context of a quippy tweet meant to share its informational article, those statements do not rise to the level of a command.”
The statements “don’t prohibit doctors from prescribing ivermectin to treat COVID or for any other purpose” Ms. Honold said. She noted that the FDA, along with the statements, said that people should consult their health care providers about COVID-19 treatments and that they could take medicine if it was prescribed by the provider.
“FDA is clearly acknowledging that doctors have the authority to prescribe human ivermectin to treat COVID. So they are not interfering with the authority of doctors to prescribe drugs or to practice medicine,” she said.
We actually told you all of this YEARS ago!
Our reporting has been spot on from Day 1, nice to see the FDA catching up to us, but very sad it took so long.
Here is one of our prior reports:
CONFIRMED: The True Story of Ivermectin Now Coming Out!
I continue to bring you the REAL news about Ivermectin….
Real, unfiltered news with no bias.
Just the facts, ma’am!
Like this one for example:
Two Separate Doctors Claim OVER 100 Members of Congress Treated With Ivermectin!
Anyone else mad yet?
But here’s the deal…
Now the FDA is backtracking big time, trying to claim they never said you couldn’t take Ivermectin.
Yes, really…hard to even believe!
But it’s true, look at this:
The scumbags are backtracking. They knew all along Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine prevented covid. But the drug dealers would not making hundreds of billions on these functional drugs. So they poisoned billions of people with the mRNA test drug. Crimes against humanity. https://t.co/nia76r41lW
— Phenix Evely, PhD (@evely_phenix) November 22, 2022
And this:
I'm not making accusations. This will all come out in the wash eventually. The FDA in the US is already backtracking by claiming that when they said don't use ivermectin it was only a "suggestion."
— ConnectALLtheDots …🟣⚪️🟢… (@thedotconnectr) December 12, 2022
They knew all along:
https://twitter.com/wolsned/status/1603157314147868672
In fact, some studies are now showing it MIGHT be highly effective at destroying cancer:
The horse dewormer strikes again. https://t.co/6qofYPNGHV
— Dr. Urso (@richardursomd) December 15, 2022
Catturd right again:
Remember when they said Ivermectin was only horse paste – and the low IQ, anti-science, useful idiots clapped like trained government seals.
— Catturd ™ (@catturd2) December 14, 2022
A wave of truth is coming out:
The FDA’s website states, “Currently available data do not show ivermectin is effective against #COVID19.”
🚨 But half of the studies to which the FDA points support using #ivermectine against #COVID_19, an @EpochTimes review (by @ZackStieber) has found👇https://t.co/9DImZ7kvah
— Jan Jekielek (@JanJekielek) December 11, 2022
Here is Dr. Peter McCullough:
#BREAKING: Dr. Peter McCullough says the FDA acted criminally and should be sued for misleading the public by spreading misinformation on Ivermectin's ability to treat Covid-19 – causing unnecessary death. pic.twitter.com/Bg3ZS756tc
— govt.exe is corrupt (@govt_corrupt) December 16, 2022
Just remember we told you the TRUTH all along…
They didn’t want you to see this but we showed you from Day 1!
Watch it here on Rumble:
Remember this disclaimer:
I am not a doctor. I am not giving you medical advice. I’m a REPORTER. I research and I report and I give you the full story open and honestly so YOU can decide.
Now let’s go to another video.
This woman below documented her own journey with Ivermectin on video.
She starts off looking not so good but makes a swift turnaround in just a few days.
This is not me talking, listen to her share and document her own story….
Here is the video from Rumble:
Now let’s talk about the MSM disinformation campaign, which is a nice way of saying “outright lies and propaganda”.
Look, I will give you one disclaimer before we get started: I am a journalist and not anyone with any medical expertise. I’m not a doctor and I’m not giving medical advice.
I’m just presenting you with the results of my research that the MSM really seems to want to hide….
And I know how to do my research.
So let’s start with this:
Now let’s unpack all the lies the MSM has been telling you about Ivermectin.
You would assume based on all the MSM propaganda that Ivermectin is only approved for Horses and not Humans.
The only problem with that?
It’s not true.
Not even close.
Here’s the real truth:
Yes folks, that is a statement taken from PolitiFact’s very own fact-checking page about Ivermectin.
But what they do with their “Face Check” is so insidious….
Here’s how PolitiFact tries to claim that the TRUE statement is still somehow false, watch these mental gymnastics:
This post was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook.)
It is true that ivermectin was approved by the Food and Drug Administration that year — but not to treat the coronavirus. The drug was approved for strongyloidiasis, a disease caused by a roundworm, and onchocerciasis, or river blindness, which is caused by a parasitic worm.
The drug was approved for humans under the brand name Stromectol, National Geographic reported, and since then it’s been recognized as a safe treatment for several tropical diseases caused by parasites. In 2015, two scientists even won a Nobel Prize for their discovery of ivermectin and its use to treat diseases caused by parasites.
But unlike, say, river blindness, COVID-19 is caused by a coronavirus, not by parasites. And as PolitiFact recently reported in a story exploring ivermectin, there’s no conclusive evidence that ivermectin is effective against COVID-19.
The lying and the deception is just so evil, really makes me angry.
If you gave me a full year, I couldn’t come up with all the twists and turns these people take to turn the TRUTH into a lie.
It’s sickening.
But we’re just getting started.
Next come the scare tactics and VERY misleading headlines.
Like this article from WIVB Channel 4 News:
After a recent resurgence in several states, health officials are warning residents to be aware of a dangerous of an unauthorized “treatment” for COVID-19 — often being taken with dangerous consequences.
It’s called ivermectin and it’s used to treat and prevent parasites in animals, the Food and Drug Administration explains. The tablets are not FDA approved for treatment of COVID-19 in humans and isn’t even an anti-viral drug — meaning it has no impact on the coronavirus. And because the large-concentration tablets are intended for large animals, these can be treacherous for humans.
In addition to not being authorized for treatment, there’s no evidence ivermectin treats COVID-19.
“There’s a lot of misinformation around, and you may have heard that it’s okay to take large doses of ivermectin. That is wrong.”
FDA The FDA and several state officials say they’ve seen an uptick in calamitous use of the drugs, particularly tablets used to treat parasitic worms in horses. While ivermectin is approved for humans to treat certain skin conditions (rosacea) and certain external parasites like head lice, the FDA warns this ivermectin is different than the one used in animals.
On Friday, the Mississippi Department of Health was forced to send out a warning to residents about the dangers of the drug after several poisonings.
The Mississippi Poison Control Center said at least 70% of recent ivermectin-related calls are tied to people taking livestock or animal formulations they bought a livestock supply stores or through online markets.
Eighty-five percent of callers had mild symptoms — these include rash, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain — but one person needed evaluation because of how much they’d taken.
More severe dangers of ivermectin ingestion include neurologic disorders, seizures, coma and death.
Use of ivermectin should only be taken if prescribed by a doctor for an FDA-approved use. Regardless of the usage and prescription, the FDA warns ivermectin overdose is still possible. Possible interaction with other medications is also a possibility.
I highlighted the key parts.
A 70% SURGE in Ivermectin Poison Center calls sounds like a lot doesn’t it?
NPR even reports a 245% surge! Oh my!
Sounds bad until you realize according to NPR that the 245% surge is going from 133 calls to 459 calls….NATIONWIDE!
According to the National Poison Data System (NPDS), which collects information from the nation’s 55 poison control centers, there was a 245% jump in reported exposure cases from July to August — from 133 to 459.
Yes folks, out of 333 MILLION people, there were 459 calls to poison centers.
So 0.00000137% of the population.
And those are just calls.
According to the bold part of the Channel 4 article, 85% of those people who called or had symptoms had MILD symptoms like a rash.
The horror!
According to the article, only ONE person needed a further evaluation.
But is this what you hear in the MSM?
No.
If you listed only to the MSM fear-porn, you’d think we had a crisis of Ivermectin deaths.
The truth is the polar opposite.
Anyone else REALLY tired of being lied to?
It’s why I’m here.
I will continue to shout the truth from the rooftops!
But I’m not done yet.
Did you know that Ivermectin has actually been listed even by the corrupt WHO as one of the most “essential medicines” out there?
It’s true, you can read it right here until they take it down.
But I’m not done yet!
Let’s cut right to the chase and go to a medical journal to see the true toxicity data on Ivermectin in humans.
Seems like something JOURNALISTS should do, don’t you think?
Let’s go to INCHEM.org, the WHO’s own website for “Internationally Peer Reviewed Chemical Safety Information”.
They lay it out in black and white and even a non-medical person like me can understand it.
Now let’s go down to Section 7.2 of their report which is about Toxicity in Humans:
I’m going to bold the key part:
7.2 Toxicity 7.2.1 Human data 7.2.1.1 Adults Amounts approaching the therapeutic doses in animals (100 to 200 ðg/kg bodyweight) are not hazardous to humans. Ingestions of large quantities (10 to 100 times the animal therapeutic dosage) may produce symptoms resembling those observed in animal toxicology studies at high toxic levels. An adult female accidentally self-injected a small quantity (approximately 200 ðg/kg) subcutaneously. Twelve hours later she experienced colicky pain with nausea but recovered within 12 hours (MSD, 1988). Clinical studies of oral ivermectin given in doses from 2 to 200 ðg/kg (maximum 12 mg) have shown a pattern of adverse experiences that included only one serious event (transient stupor). The remaining adverse experiences were considered not serious and were chiefly of the type expected based on the characteristics of the underlying disease and the responses seen after treatment with other microfilaricidal drugs, except for reports of "depression" (not psychiatrically tested) in four patients in open studies (MSD, 1988). 7.2.1.2 Children
Join the conversation!
Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!